Info about the Portal system.
Administrator's Note: This is the only post the OP made on this forum, and they express an extremely low and not very objective opinion of Algonkian Writers Conferences in general and the AWC founder specifically. Michael Neff recently contacted me regarding this post, and I've offered him the opportunity to respond directly to the OP's statements. If you're considering spending money on a conference, you are strongly encouraged to do due diligence and carefully research the conference. You should never rely on a single unsupported review of anything, either good or bad.A second note: After further consideration, I'm editing the OP. The poster made only a single post here, and hasn't revisited the forum since then. I understand having bad feelings about having attended an event, but the other person involved in this dispute tells me the poster never attended the event. I know that people still read this thread, and so I'm going to use it as a tool to help folks learn how to read reviews objectively.
This paragraph isn't the best way to start off. It starts off with personal and subjective comments, then moves on to other comments that are easily shown to be untrue. Neff's book is in print, and these days, "major publishing house is relative, and almost irrelevant. "No real ties" is highly subjective as well.
Form emails are the norm for conference registrations. I haven't seen the emails sent by AWC, but any conference is selling you something, and has to pay for the product (the venue, the speakers, etc), so of course they want you to pay soon. That's why so many conferences offer early bird specials.
This paragraph is addressed below by Mr Neff.
Yes, technically "anyone can be an editor." All one has to do is come up with a catchy company name and tell the Internet "Hey, over here! I'm an editor!" That's why every article I've ever read about choosing an editor urges the reader to carefully vet their choice. Do your research!It's also not clear here which event the OP is talking about, as AWC offers 4 types of events, and even classifies them from mild to intense, and only some of the events have agents in attendance. Read conference materials carefully.
Of course the editors are being paid to be there. Few in this business can afford to be at these events out of the goodness of their hearts. The statement that "you will not be discovered at Alkgonkian" is a universal statement, and those are rarely true. In fact, the materials at AWC's website give you a great way to discount this comment. Again: read the conference promotional materials, and do your research!
Neff advised the OP never attended an AWC event, so this paragraph rings untrue. Even if it is partially true, editors are people, and can be bored. Our job as a writer is to make sure they're not bored. If the editor is bored, the reader will be as well.
This also sounds untrue. The AWC website lists testimonials, as does any good promotional website. Start there, and research the people who post there. AWC makes it easy, with links to various agencies. There are also sites like Preditors & Editors that report on scams and unscrupulous people in the industry.
Unsubstantiated, subjective, and personal. Again, Neff reports that this poster never attended a conference, so how could she feel "ripped off?"