Mystery Writers Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


MWF is on Twitter. Follow @MystryWrtrs for forum tweets. See who we're following.

collapse collapse
* Search

* User Info
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Who's Online
  • Dot Guests: 8
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: SCOTUS Decision on Forensic Analysts  (Read 7037 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bob Mueller

  • Administrator
  • Ink-Stained Wretch
  • *****
  • Karma: 67
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,001
  • Benevolent Admin
    • More about me
SCOTUS Decision on Forensic Analysts
« on: June 25, 2009, 10:56:50 PM »

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that crime lab reports used in drug and other cases can be introduced as evidence at trial only if defendants can cross-examine the forensic analysts who prepared them.

The case came from Massachusetts; it was a cocaine-trafficking case that partly depended on a crime-lab report on white powder found in the defendant's car. The defense wanted to call the lab tech as a witness, but the judge said no, and Melendez-Diaz was convicted.

Here's more information from the SCOTUSBlog and the ScotusWiki case summary.

Basically, this will give us opportunities to have more fun with the lab tech and such, if we're doing courtroom stories.

Sometimes it takes therapy to put the past behind you. Other times, it takes a 20 gallon trash bag and a couple of cinder blocks.
Pages: [1]   Go Up

* Calendar
May 2023
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
[28] 29 30 31

No calendar events were found.

Paying the bills...

* Forum Staff
admin Bob Mueller
admin MWF Bot
gmod MysteryAdmin
Global Moderator
gmod laurihart
Global Moderator

Page created in 0.108 seconds with 42 queries.

SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal